Casio EX-ZR700 vs Pentax WG-1
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2011
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Pentax WG-1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Pentax. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WG-1 (14MP) is pretty similar and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR700 was revealed 2 years later than the WG-1 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-ZR700 matches up against the WG-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Pentax Optio WG-1. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Pentax WG-1
EX-ZR700 | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | February 2011 | Fresher by 25 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Casio EX-ZR700
WG-1 | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Pentax WG-1
EX-ZR700 | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 enjoys outside dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-1 has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Pentax WG-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the WG-1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and WG-1 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and WG-1.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR700 to deliver more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Pentax |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2011-02-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 157g (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | 260 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $370 | $350 |