Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the EX-ZR700 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") come with different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR700 was announced 17 months later than the GR Digital IV making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR700 grades versus the GR Digital IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-ZR700 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | September 2011 | More recent by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-ZR700
GR Digital IV | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 922k | Sharper display (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-ZR700 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 comes with outside dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR700 compared to the GR Digital IV.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and GR Digital IV is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The graphic here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and GR Digital IV.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR700 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Casio EX-ZR700 will give more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR700 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | 390 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $370 | $599 |