Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is relatively similar and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR700 was launched 12 months prior to the WG-4 GPS so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR700 grades vs the WG-4 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-ZR700 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-ZR700
WG-4 GPS | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | January 2013 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-ZR700 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 comes with exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the WG-4 GPS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and WG-4 GPS is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The picture underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and WG-4 GPS.
Plainly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP so you can expect similar quality of photographs though you really should take the age of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR700 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 235g (0.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | 240 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $370 | $210 |