Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-70
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-80
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Ricoh WG-70, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-ZR700 was announced 8 years earlier than the WG-70 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR700 grades against the WG-70 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Ricoh WG-70. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Ricoh WG-70
| EX-ZR700 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| WG-70 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 85 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh WG-70
| EX-ZR700 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers outside dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Ricoh WG-70 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the WG-70.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and WG-70 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The photograph underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and WG-70.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP and you should expect comparable quality of pictures but you will want to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR700 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Portrait photography information
Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography information
manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Street photography highlights
Ricoh WG-70 Street photography highlights
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (222g)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
has image stabilization (Digital)
environment proof
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography factors
amazing zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
great battery (470 per charge)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
environment proof
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-70
great battery (470 per charge)
lighter than others (222 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
very long zoom (450mm)
no Time Lapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
environment proof
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-70
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
great battery (470 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
environment proof
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging information
Ricoh WG-70 Vlogging information
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (222 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no mic support
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
missing mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | 300 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $370 | $280 |
