Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-80
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2022
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-70
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Ricoh WG-80, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR700 was manufactured 10 years prior to the WG-80 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-ZR700 grades against the WG-80 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Ricoh WG-80. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Ricoh WG-80
EX-ZR700 | WG-80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Casio EX-ZR700
WG-80 | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2022 | January 2013 | More modern by 113 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh WG-80
EX-ZR700 | WG-80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 provides physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Ricoh WG-80 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the WG-80.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and WG-80 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The picture below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and WG-80.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of files however you may want to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR700 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh WG-80 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2022-05-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.70 inch |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | 300 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $370 | $300 |