Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-M1
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly similar and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR700 was launched 19 months earlier than the WG-M1 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR700 grades against the WG-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-ZR700 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| WG-M1 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 19 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-ZR700 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR700 comes with outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the WG-M1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and WG-M1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The photograph below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The older EX-ZR700 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | 350 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $370 | $2,000 |
