Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR700 was unveiled 6 months later than the Galaxy Camera 4G and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR700 scores against the Galaxy Camera 4G with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| EX-ZR700 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 0k | Clearer screen (+922k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Casio EX-ZR700
| Galaxy Camera 4G | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 4.8" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| EX-ZR700 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | August 2012 | Similar generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has specifications of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the Galaxy Camera 4G.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and Galaxy Camera 4G is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and Galaxy Camera 4G.
All in all, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of images although you should always consider the release date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Portrait photography details
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Portrait photography details
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
comes with face detect focusing
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Street photography camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (305g)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography details
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sports photography details
great zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
great battery (470 CIPA)
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (23-481mm 20.9 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G as a Travel photography camera
great battery (470 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great reach (450mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than others in class (305g)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
pretty wide (23mm)
very long zoom (481mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography details
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Landscape photography details
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
great battery (470 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
pretty wide (23mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
big screen (4.8")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging info
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Vlogging info
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic port
pretty wide (23mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (305g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2012-08-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | - |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 305 gr (0.67 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $370 | $550 |
