Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL102
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR700 was unveiled 4 years after the SL102 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR700 scores versus the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-ZR700 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 50 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| SL102 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung SL102
| EX-ZR700 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 provides external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR700 compared to the SL102.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and SL102 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over specs. The image below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and SL102.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR700 to deliver more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $370 | $130 |