Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c919/1c9190b66ae9d20e63ea1a028964e79ad2a5586f" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9341/e93412f40c7362d3e09ff5f3d2f972e609f5d64d" alt="Samsung SL202 front Samsung SL202 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung SL202, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The EX-ZR700 was launched 4 years after the SL202 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR700 grades vs the SL202 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung SL202
EX-ZR700 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 49 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-ZR700
SL202 | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung SL202
EX-ZR700 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 enjoys outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the SL202.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d55fb/d55fbf3505c2898123907c2eecfe2a910cf4df0f" alt="Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and SL202 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ced24/ced24237fec2f5424e1bccd4ba3fa88ce9b2793c" alt="Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and SL202.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to result in more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR700 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c051f/c051f98533ea1cf1de560937319f140f68b6bd43" alt="Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430dc/430dc14cea24bfa7aa504f88356cea3f8e4745ff" alt="Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung SL202 |
Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $370 | $140 |