Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST65
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung ST65, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR700 was manufactured 2 years later than the ST65 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR700 grades against the ST65 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Samsung ST65. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung ST65
| EX-ZR700 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| ST65 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung ST65
| EX-ZR700 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 enjoys physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung ST65 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung ST65 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the ST65.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and ST65 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The visual here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and ST65.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to offer more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR700 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST65 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $370 | $130 |