Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST700
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
99 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Announced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST700 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung ST700, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the ST700 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR700 was announced 2 years after the ST700 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST700 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR700 scores against the ST700 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Samsung ST700. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung ST700
| EX-ZR700 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 26 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| ST700 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung ST700
| EX-ZR700 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR700 provides external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung ST700 has measurements of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung ST700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the ST700.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and ST700 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The image below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and ST700.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution and you can expect similar quality of images but you will need to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer EX-ZR700 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $370 | $280 |