Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST90
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST90 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung ST90, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the ST90 (14MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR700 was brought out 2 years later than the ST90 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST90 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR700 scores versus the ST90 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST90 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Samsung ST90. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Samsung ST90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung ST90
EX-ZR700 | ST90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | January 2011 | More recent by 25 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST90 over the Casio EX-ZR700
ST90 | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung ST90
EX-ZR700 | ST90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST90 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR700 features external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung ST90 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung ST90 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the ST90.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and ST90 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST90 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and ST90.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to result in more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR700 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST90 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST90 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | - |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $370 | $150 |