Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung TL240
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is ST5000
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung TL240, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR700 was introduced 3 years after the TL240 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR700 scores against the TL240 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Samsung TL240. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung TL240
EX-ZR700 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | January 2010 | More modern by 38 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Casio EX-ZR700
TL240 | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung TL240
EX-ZR700 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR700 has physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung TL240 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the TL240.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and TL240 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The picture underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and TL240.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR700 to provide greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR700 provides an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung TL240 |
Also called | - | ST5000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $370 | $171 |