Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB150F
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR700 was introduced 13 months later than the WB150F which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-ZR700 matches up against the WB150F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung WB150F
| EX-ZR700 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2012 | More recent by 13 months | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-ZR700
| WB150F | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB150F
| EX-ZR700 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 features outside dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB150F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the WB150F.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and WB150F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and WB150F.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR700 to give extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR700 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB150F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 188g (0.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $370 | $230 |