Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB2200F
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44


59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Revealed January 2014

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is fairly close and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR700 was manufactured 11 months earlier than the WB2200F which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-ZR700 scores versus the WB2200F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Samsung WB2200F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung WB2200F
EX-ZR700 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-ZR700
WB2200F | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 11 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB2200F
EX-ZR700 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 has got outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has proportions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB2200F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the WB2200F.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and WB2200F is 91 and 59 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The picture below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and WB2200F.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of images however you should always consider the age of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR700 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB2200F |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 922k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dot |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 1/8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 708 grams (1.56 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $370 | $599 |