Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB250F
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR700 was revealed very close to the WB250F which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR700 grades versus the WB250F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-ZR700 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-ZR700
| WB250F | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-ZR700 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung WB250F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the WB250F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and WB250F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The image here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and WB250F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to render more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics way more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB250F Portrait photography information
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has face detection focus
manual focus not available
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Street photography with Samsung WB250F
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (222 grams)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (226 grams)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB250F Sports photography factors
great zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
better than average battery power (470 shots)
slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
excellent zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Travel photography info
Samsung WB250F Travel photography info
better than average battery power (470 CIPA)
lighter than others (222 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competitors in class (226 grams)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (432mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB250F Landscape photography details
you can focus manually
relatively wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
better than average battery power (470 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB250F as a Vlogging camera
relatively wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (222g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic jack
rather wide (24mm)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (226g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB250F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $370 | $250 |