Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB30F
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB30F, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR700 was introduced within a month of the WB30F and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-ZR700 scores vs the WB30F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung WB30F
| EX-ZR700 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-ZR700
| WB30F | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB30F
| EX-ZR700 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 provides exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB30F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the WB30F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and WB30F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The pic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and WB30F.
Clearly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution and you should expect comparable quality of photos but you need to consider the release date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focus
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Street photography with Samsung WB30F
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (222 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (128g)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Sports photography with Samsung WB30F
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
great battery pack (470 shots)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Travel photography camera
great battery pack (470 per charge)
lighter than others in class (222g)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (450mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than average (128g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
no Timelapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB30F Landscape photography highlights
you can focus manually
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
great battery pack (470 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging information
Samsung WB30F Vlogging information
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (222g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of mic port
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
lighter than average (128 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB30F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 128 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $370 | $180 |