Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB750
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
93 Imaging
37 Features
50 Overall
42
93 Imaging
37 Features
50 Overall
42
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Announced September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and WB750 (13MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR700 was brought out 18 months later than the WB750 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR700 scores versus the WB750 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Samsung WB750. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung WB750
| EX-ZR700 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | September 2011 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| WB750 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB750
| EX-ZR700 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 has outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB750 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR700 compared to the WB750.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and WB750 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing simply by seeing specs. The visual here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and WB750.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR700 to produce extra detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR700 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB750 Portrait photography factors
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
manual focus
resolution is good (13 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Street photography info
Samsung WB750 Street photography info
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (193g)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography features
Samsung WB750 Sports photography features
great zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
good battery life (470 per charge)
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
amazing zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (13MP)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Travel photography with Samsung WB750
good battery life (470 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (25mm)
long reach (450mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than others (193 grams)
resolution is good (13 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
great reach (432mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Landscape photography with Samsung WB750
focusing manually
decently wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
good battery life (470 per charge)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (13 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR700
Vlogging with Samsung WB750
decently wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of mic support
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (193 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not posses selfie friendly display
does not have external microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB750 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $370 | $339 |
