Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB800F
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR700 was introduced very close to the WB800F which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR700 matches up vs the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZR700 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-ZR700
| WB800F | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZR700 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR700 features physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the WB800F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and WB800F is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The pic here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and WB800F.
All in all, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP therefore you should expect similar quality of files but you have to consider the release date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Portrait photography features
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography features
you can focus manually
good resolution (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Street photography info
Samsung WB800F Street photography info
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (222g)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (218g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB800F Sports photography factors
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
good battery power (470 per charge)
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Travel photography camera
good battery power (470 per charge)
lighter than others in class (222 grams)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than others in class (218g)
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
no Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Landscape photography with Samsung WB800F
you can focus manually
fairly wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
good battery power (470 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
has manual focus
quite wide (23mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging information
Samsung WB800F Vlogging information
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (222 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
lack of mic socket
quite wide (23mm)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (218g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no external mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $370 | $300 |