Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony T900
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony T900 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony T900, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Sony. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR700 was manufactured 4 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR700 matches up vs the T900 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Sony T900
| EX-ZR700 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 49 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| T900 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Sony T900
| EX-ZR700 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 922k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 has got physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony T900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the T900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and T900 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by viewing specifications. The photograph below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and T900.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 143 grams (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $370 | $300 |