Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm JV200

Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
FujiFilm FinePix JV200 front
Portability
96 Imaging
36 Features
18 Overall
28

Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm JV200 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed August 2013
FujiFilm JV200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2011
  • Alternative Name is FinePix JV205
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm JV200 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR800 and FujiFilm JV200, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the JV200 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-ZR800 was released 2 years after the JV200 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the JV200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the FujiFilm JV200

          

          

            
 EX-ZR800 JV200 
RevealedAugust 2013January 2011Newer by 32 months
Manual focus  Very accurate focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution922k230kClearer screen (+692k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Casio EX-ZR800

          

          

            
 JV200 EX-ZR800 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and FujiFilm JV200

          

          

            
 EX-ZR800 JV200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither contains Touch screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm JV200 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the FujiFilm JV200 has sizing of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR800 and FujiFilm JV200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the JV200.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm JV200 size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and JV200 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm JV200 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm JV200 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The picture below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and JV200.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 should have an edge in sensor innovation.

            Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm JV200 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm JV200 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm JV200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Portrait photography camera
 FujiFilm JV200 as a Portrait photography camera
43
 has manual focus
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 supports face detection focusing
 external flash not possible
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
28
 MP count decent (14 megapixels)
 manual focus not available
 manual mode not possible
 no external flash support
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography details
FujiFilm JV200 Street photography details
61
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average in class (222g)
 screen is fixed
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
55
 lighter than average in class (125g)
 screen does not articulate
 does not have image stabilization
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Sports photography with FujiFilm JV200
50
 amazing zoom range (25-450mm  18.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 supports tracking autofocus
 good battery power (470 CIPA)
 painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect AF
29
 MP count decent (14 megapixels)
 offers tracking focus
 low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
 continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
 no shutter priority mode
 does not have image stabilization
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 terrible battery life (180 CIPA)
 lack of phase detect auto focus
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography highlights
FujiFilm JV200 Travel photography highlights
74
 good battery power (470 per charge)
 lighter than average in class (222g)
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 fairly wide (25mm)
 great zoom (450mm)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
60
 lighter than average in class (125 grams)
 MP count decent (14MP)
 flash built-in
 does not have Timelapse recording
 terrible battery life (180 per charge)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
 slow max aperture (f3.1)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Landscape photography with FujiFilm JV200
54
 has manual focus
 fairly wide (25mm)
 pretty good screen size (3")
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 good battery power (470 per charge)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
28
 MP count decent (14 megapixels)
 manual focus not available
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
 slow max aperture (f3.1)
 tiny screen (2.7")
 manual mode not possible
 does not have image stabilization
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
 terrible battery life (180 per charge)
 does not have Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging highlights
FujiFilm JV200 Vlogging highlights
34
 fairly wide (25mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detection focusing
 high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than average in class (222g)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 doesn't have external microphone socket
25
 lighter than average in class (125 grams)
 wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
 slow max aperture (f3.1)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 does not have image stabilization
 low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
 does not have microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
        
                
        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm JV200 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and FujiFilm JV200
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800FujiFilm FinePix JV200
General Information
Brand Name Casio FujiFilm
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 FujiFilm FinePix JV200
Alternative name - FinePix JV205
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2013-08-07 2011-01-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO - 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW data    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
AF touch    
Continuous AF    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
AF multi area    
Live view AF    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-450mm (18.0x) 36-108mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.1-5.6
Macro focusing range 4cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 922k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1400 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 222 gr (0.49 lb) 125 gr (0.28 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 shots 180 shots
Battery type Battery Pack AA
Battery ID NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature    
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD / SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $429 $49