Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daa88/daa88bfe6d889d427e008123c5647754bbcdb923" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c77a/8c77aadddb2dd83c184ebc98b6222f9d6a0cd221" alt="FujiFilm FinePix S1600 front FujiFilm FinePix S1600 front"
78 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F4.0-4.8) lens
- 337g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix S1770
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus FujiFilm S1600, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and S1600 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-ZR800 was manufactured 3 years later than the S1600 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S1600 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR800 grades against the S1600 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & FujiFilm FinePix S1600. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & FujiFilm S1600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the FujiFilm S1600
EX-ZR800 | S1600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S1600 over the Casio EX-ZR800
S1600 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and FujiFilm S1600
EX-ZR800 | S1600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the FujiFilm S1600 has sizing of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") along with a weight of 337 grams (0.74 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 versus FujiFilm S1600 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the S1600.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e8fe/1e8fe8357b7a0a7383800e5ad3e9d73ad3029889" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and S1600 is 91 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbb46/bbb46794b3d2ac302a4afdec88d5348d9144329a" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through specifications. The photograph below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and S1600.
Plainly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to render more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b90e/3b90e20214038e4543549956b07a0afe36e50fb7" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4d36/b4d36732577927687375c4a324d9fed51ac83a63" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S1600 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | FujiFilm FinePix S1600 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | FujiFilm FinePix S1600 |
Otherwise known as | - | FinePix S1770 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/4.0-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 99% |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 337 gr (0.74 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $429 | $130 |