Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800/Casio-EX-ZR800-front.jpg)
![FujiFilm FinePix S4000 front FujiFilm FinePix S4000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-S4000/FujiFilm-S4000-front.jpg)
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Launched January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix S4050
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-ZR800 and FujiFilm S4000, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the S4000 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR800 was brought out 2 years after the S4000 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S4000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-ZR800 matches up versus the S4000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and FujiFilm FinePix S4000. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and FujiFilm S4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the FujiFilm S4000
EX-ZR800 | S4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 32 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S4000 over the Casio EX-ZR800
S4000 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and FujiFilm S4000
EX-ZR800 | S4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 features physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S4000 has dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") along with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR800 and FujiFilm S4000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the S4000.
![Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-S4000-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and S4000 is 91 and 67 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-S4000-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and S4000.
As you can see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to result in more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
![Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-S4000-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-S4000-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs FujiFilm S4000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | FujiFilm FinePix S4000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | FujiFilm FinePix S4000 |
Otherwise known as | - | FinePix S4050 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 7.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 540 grams (1.19 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | 300 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery model | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $429 | $279 |