Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm HS35EXR
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
59 Imaging
40 Features
57 Overall
46
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 687g - 131 x 97 x 126mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm HS30EXR
- Successor is Fujifilm HS50 EXR
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Fujifilm HS35EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the Fujifilm HS35EXR (16MP) is very well matched but the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm HS35EXR (1/2") feature different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR800 was revealed 8 months after the Fujifilm HS35EXR and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm HS35EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the Fujifilm HS35EXR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Fujifilm HS35EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Fujifilm HS35EXR
EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm HS35EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2013 | January 2013 | Newer by 8 months | |
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS35EXR over the Casio EX-ZR800
Fujifilm HS35EXR | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm HS35EXR
EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm HS35EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 has physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm HS35EXR has sizing of 131mm x 97mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") having a weight of 687 grams (1.51 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Fujifilm HS35EXR in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the Fujifilm HS35EXR.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm HS35EXR is 91 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm HS35EXR.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses the exact same resolution but different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR800 features the tinier sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging. The more recent EX-ZR800 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | EXR |
Sensor type | CMOS | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 922k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor with Sunny Day mode |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 7.10 m (Wide: 30cm - 7.1m / Tele: 2.0m - 3.8m ) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 687 gr (1.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 131 x 97 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | 600 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | NP-W126 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $429 | $380 |