Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S8400W
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S8400W Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
Fujifilm S8400W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released March 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S8400W Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S8400W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) is very close and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR800 was released 5 months later than the Fujifilm S8400W so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the Fujifilm S8400W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S8400W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Fujifilm FinePix S8400W. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Fujifilm S8400W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Fujifilm S8400W
| EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm S8400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Casio EX-ZR800
| Fujifilm S8400W | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm S8400W
| EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm S8400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2013 |  | March 2013 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S8400W Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 features physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Fujifilm S8400W has sizing of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S8400W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the Fujifilm S8400W.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm S8400W is 91 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S8400W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing specs. The photograph below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm S8400W.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of files though you may want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S8400W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Portrait photography camera
Fujifilm S8400W as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
manual focus
decent MP (16MP)
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography factors
Fujifilm S8400W Street photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (222 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competitors (670g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography details
Fujifilm S8400W Sports photography details
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
great battery pack (470 per charge)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
excellent zoom range (24-1056mm 44.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography advice
Fujifilm S8400W Travel photography advice
great battery pack (470 shots)
lighter than competition (222 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (450mm)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (1056mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors (670g)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Landscape photography with Fujifilm S8400W
you can focus manually
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
great battery pack (470 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging details
Fujifilm S8400W Vlogging details
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (222g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone jack
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no external mic port
heavier than competitors (670 grams)
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S8400W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-08-07 | 2013-03-22 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-1056mm (44.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 670 grams (1.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $429 | $300 |