Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S9400W

Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S9400W Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed August 2013
Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S9400W Overview

Below is a detailed review of the Casio EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm S9400W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-ZR800 was released 5 months earlier than the Fujifilm S9400W which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the Fujifilm S9400W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Fujifilm S9400W

		

		

			
 EX-ZR800 Fujifilm S9400W 
Manual focus  Dial exact focusing
Screen resolution922k460kClearer screen (+462k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Casio EX-ZR800

		

		

			
 Fujifilm S9400W EX-ZR800 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm S9400W

		

		

			
 EX-ZR800 Fujifilm S9400W 
RevealedAugust 2013January 2014Same age
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen  Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen  No Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S9400W Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 comes with external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S9400W has measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm S9400W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the Fujifilm S9400W.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S9400W size comparison
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm S9400W is 91 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S9400W top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S9400W Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Often, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through specifications. The visual here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm S9400W.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you may want to take the launch date  of the cameras into account.
	
			Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S9400W sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photography Glossary	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Portrait photography camera
 Fujifilm S9400W as a Portrait photography camera
44
 focusing manually
 decent MP (16 megapixels)
 comes with face detect autofocus
 cannot use external flash
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
37
 MP count good (16 megapixels)
 offers face detection focusing
 manual focus not available
 cannot use external flash
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Street Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Street photography with Fujifilm S9400W
61
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors (222g)
 screen is fixed
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
41
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 no articulating screen
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
 heavier than others in class (670 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Sports Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Sports photography camera
 Fujifilm S9400W as a Sports photography camera
51
 great zoom range (25-450mm  18.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent MP (16 megapixels)
 comes with tracking focus
 good battery power (470 shots)
 max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect autofocus
55
 amazing zoom range (24-1200mm  50.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 MP count good (16MP)
 offers tracking autofocus
 good battery (500 shots)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Travel Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Travel photography camera
 Fujifilm S9400W as a Travel photography camera
74
 good battery power (470 per charge)
 lighter than competitors (222 grams)
 decent MP (16MP)
 built-in flash
 rather wide (25mm)
 long zoom (450mm)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
54
 good battery (500 per charge)
 MP count good (16MP)
 built-in flash
 decently wide (24mm)
 very long zoom (1200mm)
 lack of Time Lapse mode
 heavier than others in class (670 grams)
 doesn't offer selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Landscape Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Landscape photography camera
 Fujifilm S9400W as a Landscape photography camera
55
 focusing manually
 rather wide (25mm)
 screen size is decent (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent MP (16 megapixels)
 good battery power (470 shots)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
44
 decently wide (24mm)
 nice screen size (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 MP count good (16 megapixels)
 good battery (500 per charge)
 manual focus not available
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
 lack of Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Vlogging camera
 Fujifilm S9400W as a Vlogging camera
34
 rather wide (25mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with face detect autofocus
 high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 lighter than competitors (222 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 missing microphone socket
26
 decently wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 offers face detection focusing
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
 doesn't offer selfie friendly display
 lack of external mic socket
 heavier than others in class (670g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	

		

			
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S9400W Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm S9400W
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Fujifilm FinePix S9400W
General Information
Brand Casio FujiFilm
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Fujifilm FinePix S9400W
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2013-08-07 2014-01-06
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 12800
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detect autofocus    
Contract detect autofocus    
Phase detect autofocus    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus distance 4cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 922k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 201k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 97 percent
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1700s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 4.70 m 7.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Mic port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 222 grams (0.49 lb) 670 grams (1.48 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 shots 500 shots
Battery type Battery Pack AA
Battery model NP-130 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording    
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $429 $330