Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm Z33WP
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
96 Imaging
32 Features
20 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Overview
Here, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm Z33WP, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and FujiFilm. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR800 was released 4 years after the Fujifilm Z33WP which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the Fujifilm Z33WP for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2013 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 50 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Casio EX-ZR800
| Fujifilm Z33WP | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm Z33WP
| EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm Z33WP has dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm Z33WP in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the Fujifilm Z33WP.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm Z33WP is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by checking out specs. The picture below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm Z33WP.
All in all, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 110 gr (0.24 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | NP-45 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $429 | $197 |