Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak M550
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak M550 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak M550 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak M550, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Kodak. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and M550 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR800 was manufactured 3 years after the M550 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-ZR800 scores versus the M550 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak M550 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Kodak EasyShare M550. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Kodak M550 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Kodak M550
EX-ZR800 | M550 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2013 | January 2010 | More modern by 44 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Casio EX-ZR800
M550 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Kodak M550
EX-ZR800 | M550 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak M550 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides outside dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Kodak M550 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak M550 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the M550.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and M550 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak M550 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The pic here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and M550.
As you can see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to result in more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak M550 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak M550 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Kodak EasyShare M550 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Kodak EasyShare M550 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2010-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $429 | $119 |