Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Z915
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Announced January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Z915, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Kodak. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and Z915 (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR800 was unveiled 4 years after the Z915 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the Z915 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Kodak EasyShare Z915. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Kodak Z915
| EX-ZR800 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2013 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 56 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| Z915 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Kodak Z915
| EX-ZR800 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z915 has dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Z915 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the Z915.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and Z915 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking a spec sheet. The image here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and Z915.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to give you greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1250s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $429 | $200 |