Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
55
Overall
45
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
Portability
95
Imaging
38
Features
35
Overall
36

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced August 2013
Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview

Below is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-ZR800 was revealed 24 months later than the Easyshare M5370 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-ZR800 grades against the Easyshare M5370 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 EX-ZR800 Easyshare M5370 
ReleasedAugust 2013September 2011More recent by 24 months
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display resolution922k230kSharper display (+692k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Casio EX-ZR800

 Easyshare M5370 EX-ZR800 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Kodak Easyshare M5370

 EX-ZR800 Easyshare M5370 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the Easyshare M5370.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and Easyshare M5370 is 91 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The visual underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and Easyshare M5370.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same MP and you can expect similar quality of photographs although you would want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The younger EX-ZR800 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Portrait photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
43
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
34
good resolution (16 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography highlights
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Street photography highlights
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (222g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
48
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography factors
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sports photography factors
50
amazing zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (470 shots)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
29
good resolution (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Travel photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
74
better than average battery pack (470 per charge)
lighter than others (222 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
72
good resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
missing Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography factors
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Landscape photography factors
54
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
better than average battery pack (470 shots)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
42
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3")
good resolution (16MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging factors
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Vlogging factors
34
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (222 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic support
32
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
built-in touchscreen
provides face detect autofocus
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone port
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Kodak Easyshare M5370
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Kodak Easyshare M5370
General Information
Brand Name Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Kodak Easyshare M5370
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2013-08-07 2011-09-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 64
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.9 -
Macro focus range 4cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 922k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m 3.20 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-1, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 222 gr (0.49 lb) 150 gr (0.33 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 photographs -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-130 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $429 $160