Casio EX-ZR800 vs Leica V-Lux 20
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Leica V-Lux 20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 218g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed April 2010
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Leica V-Lux 20 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Leica V-Lux 20, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Leica. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and V-Lux 20 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR800 was brought out 3 years after the V-Lux 20 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the V-Lux 20 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Leica V-Lux 20 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Leica V-Lux 20. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Leica V-Lux 20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Leica V-Lux 20
EX-ZR800 | V-Lux 20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | April 2010 | More modern by 41 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 922k | 461k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 20 over the Casio EX-ZR800
V-Lux 20 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Leica V-Lux 20
EX-ZR800 | V-Lux 20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Leica V-Lux 20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Leica V-Lux 20 has specifications of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Leica V-Lux 20 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the V-Lux 20.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and V-Lux 20 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Leica V-Lux 20 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing specs. The image below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and V-Lux 20.
All in all, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR800 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Leica V-Lux 20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Leica V-Lux 20 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Leica V-Lux 20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Leica |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Leica V-Lux 20 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2010-04-20 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $429 | $779 |