Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon A900
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Renewed by Nikon A1000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon A900 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Nikon A900, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Nikon. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the A900 (20MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR800 was announced 3 years before the A900 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR800 matches up against the A900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon A900 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Nikon Coolpix A900. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Nikon A900
| EX-ZR800 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 921k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| A900 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | August 2013 | More modern by 31 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Nikon A900
| EX-ZR800 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Nikon A900 has dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Nikon A900 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the A900.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and A900 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and A900.
Clearly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Nikon A900 to render more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR800 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 289g (0.64 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $429 | $400 |