Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P7700
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


82 Imaging
37 Features
70 Overall
50
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P7700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 392g - 119 x 73 x 50mm
- Launched May 2013
- Earlier Model is Nikon P7100

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P7700 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P7700, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Nikon. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and P7700 (12MP) and the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and P7700 (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor size.

The EX-ZR800 was launched 3 months later than the P7700 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR800 matches up versus the P7700 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P7700 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Nikon Coolpix P7700. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Nikon P7700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Nikon P7700
EX-ZR800 | P7700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon P7700 over the Casio EX-ZR800
P7700 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Nikon P7700
EX-ZR800 | P7700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | ![]() | May 2013 | Same age |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P7700 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Nikon P7700 has dimensions of 119mm x 73mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") having a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P7700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the P7700.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and P7700 is 91 and 82 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P7700 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The photograph underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and P7700.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR800 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-ZR800 will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P7700 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P7700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2013-05-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 99 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 392g (0.86 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 119 x 73 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 53 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 191 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | 330 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | EN-EL14 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $429 | $499 |