Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P950
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Released January 2020
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P950 Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Nikon P950, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the P950 (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR800 was brought out 7 years before the P950 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Nikon P950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 matches up versus the P950 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P950 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Nikon Coolpix P950. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Nikon P950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Nikon P950
EX-ZR800 | P950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 922k | 921k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Casio EX-ZR800
P950 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2020 | August 2013 | More modern by 78 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display size | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Nikon P950
EX-ZR800 | P950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P950 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Nikon P950 has sizing of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") having a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Nikon P950 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the P950.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and P950 is 91 and 52 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P950 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and P950.
Clearly, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution and you should expect comparable quality of photos however you will want to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR800 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon P950 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix P950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix P950 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-08-07 | 2020-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-2000mm (83.3x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 90% |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 300 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 1005g (2.22 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | 290 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $429 | $797 |