Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S3300
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S3300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 128g - 95 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed February 2012
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S3300 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Nikon S3300, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Nikon. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the S3300 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's DominanceThe EX-ZR800 was unveiled 19 months after the S3300 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR800 scores versus the S3300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S3300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Nikon Coolpix S3300. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Nikon S3300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Nikon S3300
EX-ZR800 | S3300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | February 2012 | More modern by 19 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S3300 over the Casio EX-ZR800
S3300 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Nikon S3300
EX-ZR800 | S3300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S3300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Nikon S3300 has sizing of 95mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Nikon S3300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the S3300.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and S3300 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S3300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The pic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and S3300.
Plainly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution so you should expect comparable quality of images although you should always take the production date of the cameras into account. The more modern EX-ZR800 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S3300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S3300 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix S3300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix S3300 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2012-02-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 26-156mm (6.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 128 grams (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 95 x 58 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | 180 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $429 | $99 |