Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S620
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-112mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
- 120g - 90 x 53 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S620 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S620, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Nikon. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and S620 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR800 was unveiled 4 years later than the S620 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 matches up versus the S620 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S620 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Nikon Coolpix S620. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Nikon S620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Nikon S620
| EX-ZR800 | S620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2013 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 55 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S620 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| S620 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Nikon S620
| EX-ZR800 | S620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S620 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 features external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Nikon S620 has measurements of 90mm x 53mm x 23mm (3.5" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S620 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the S620.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and S620 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S620 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reviewing technical specs. The visual here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and S620.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S620 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S620 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix S620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix S620 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2009-02-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.7-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 120g (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 90 x 53 x 23mm (3.5" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (3 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $429 | $37 |