Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon W300
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon W300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Launched May 2017
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon W300 Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-ZR800 and Nikon W300, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the W300 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-ZR800 was announced 4 years before the W300 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-ZR800 scores against the W300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon W300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Nikon Coolpix W300. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Nikon W300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Nikon W300
EX-ZR800 | W300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 922k | 921k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Casio EX-ZR800
W300 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | August 2013 | More recent by 46 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Nikon W300
EX-ZR800 | W300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon W300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Nikon W300 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR800 and Nikon W300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the W300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and W300 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon W300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through specifications. The photograph below might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and W300.
To sum up, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP and you can expect similar quality of images but you would want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR800 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon W300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon W300 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix W300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix W300 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-08-07 | 2017-05-31 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | - |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 922k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 231 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | 280 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Built-in |
Battery model | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $429 | $387 |