Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless and both of them are manufactured by Ricoh. The resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is fairly similar and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/1.7").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR Digital IV was manufactured 19 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the GR Digital IV grades against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
GR Digital IV | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | March 2010 | Newer by 19 months | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 920k | Sharper display (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | GR Digital IV |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
GR Digital IV | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV comes with exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 92 and 85 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital IV and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photos however you will want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more recent GR Digital IV is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 355g (0.78 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | 410 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $599 | $349 |