Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-47
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
93 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-47 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 204g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-47 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus FE-47, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the FE-47 (14MP) is very well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR800 was announced 3 years later than the FE-47 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 grades against the FE-47 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-47 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus FE-47. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus FE-47 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus FE-47
EX-ZR800 | FE-47 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | January 2010 | More recent by 44 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-47 over the Casio EX-ZR800
FE-47 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus FE-47
EX-ZR800 | FE-47 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-47 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus FE-47 has sizing of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus FE-47 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the FE-47.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and FE-47 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-47 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and FE-47.
Plainly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to give you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-47 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-47 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus FE-47 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus FE-47 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 204 gr (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $429 | $0 |