Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5010
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5010 Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus FE-5010, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and FE-5010 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR800 was unveiled 4 years later than the FE-5010 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the FE-5010 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5010 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus FE-5010. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus FE-5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus FE-5010
EX-ZR800 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 56 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Casio EX-ZR800
FE-5010 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus FE-5010
EX-ZR800 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5010 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus FE-5010 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus FE-5010 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the FE-5010.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and FE-5010 is 91 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5010 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through specifications. The visual underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and FE-5010.
Plainly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to give extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 will have an edge in sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5010 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus FE-5010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus FE-5010 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2009-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 130 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $429 | $130 |