Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5020
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also Known as X-935

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus FE-5020, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR800 was brought out 4 years later than the FE-5020 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-ZR800 scores against the FE-5020 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Olympus FE-5020. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus FE-5020
EX-ZR800 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 50 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Casio EX-ZR800
FE-5020 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus FE-5020
EX-ZR800 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got outside dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus FE-5020 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus FE-5020 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the FE-5020.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and FE-5020 is 91 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and FE-5020.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to show greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus FE-5020 |
Otherwise known as | - | X-935 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 137 grams (0.30 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $429 | $160 |