Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Older Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Refreshed by Olympus SP-610UZ

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR800 was announced 3 years later than the SP-600 UZ and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the SP-600 UZ in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus SP-600 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
EX-ZR800 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Casio EX-ZR800
SP-600 UZ | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
EX-ZR800 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus SP-600 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the SP-600 UZ.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and SP-600 UZ is 91 and 69 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The visual below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and SP-600 UZ.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to show greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 143 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1/2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 455 grams (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $429 | $189 |