Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SZ-10
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
90 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Announced February 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SZ-10 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus SZ-10, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the SZ-10 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR800 was revealed 2 years later than the SZ-10 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR800 matches up versus the SZ-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SZ-10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus SZ-10. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus SZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus SZ-10
| EX-ZR800 | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2013 | February 2011 | More recent by 31 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| SZ-10 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus SZ-10
| EX-ZR800 | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-10 has proportions of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus SZ-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the SZ-10.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and SZ-10 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual below will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and SZ-10.
As you can see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to deliver extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SZ-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus SZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus SZ-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.1-4.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 7.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 215g (0.47 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | 220 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $429 | $300 |