Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
55
Overall
45
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced August 2013
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Alternative Name is mju 9000
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

In this write-up, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-ZR800 was manufactured 4 years later than the 9000 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 matches up against the 9000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus 9000

 EX-ZR800 9000 
ReleasedAugust 2013May 2009Fresher by 52 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution922k230kSharper screen (+692k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Casio EX-ZR800

 9000 EX-ZR800 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus 9000

 EX-ZR800 9000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the 9000.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and 9000 is 91 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and 9000.

Clearly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography information
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography information
43
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
20
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Street photography with Olympus 9000
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (222g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than others in class (225 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Sports photography camera
50
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
good battery power (470 per charge)
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography highlights
Olympus 9000 Travel photography highlights
74
good battery power (470 shots)
lighter than average (222 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
great reach (450mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
58
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
long reach (280mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than others in class (225 grams)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography features
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography features
54
has manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
good battery power (470 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
34
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (222 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing mic jack
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone support
more heavy than others in class (225 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus 9000
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Olympus Stylus 9000
Alternative name - mju 9000
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2013-08-07 2009-05-14
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 50
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-450mm (18.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing distance 4cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 922k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 222g (0.49 pounds) 225g (0.50 pounds)
Dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at release $429 $300