Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR800 was manufactured 4 years later than the 9000 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 matches up against the 9000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus 9000
| EX-ZR800 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2013 | May 2009 | Fresher by 52 months | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| 9000 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus 9000
| EX-ZR800 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the 9000.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and 9000 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and 9000.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Alternative name | - | mju 9000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 225g (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $429 | $300 |