Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-1
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
Olympus SH-1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Successor is Olympus SH-2
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-1, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the SH-1 (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR800 was revealed 7 months earlier than the SH-1 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-ZR800 scores versus the SH-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus Stylus SH-1. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus SH-1
| EX-ZR800 | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| SH-1 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | August 2013 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus SH-1
| EX-ZR800 | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus SH-1 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the SH-1.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and SH-1 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and SH-1.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels and you can expect similar quality of photos although you should really take the age of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR800 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Portrait photography with Olympus SH-1
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography info
Olympus SH-1 Street photography info
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports touch focus
lighter than competition in class (271g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SH-1 as a Sports photography camera
great zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
has tracking focus
great battery power (470 CIPA)
max fps low (3.0 fps)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
offers tracking focus
better than average battery power (380 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography advice
Olympus SH-1 Travel photography advice
great battery power (470 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long reach (450mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (271g)
supports touch focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
long reach (600mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Landscape photography with Olympus SH-1
has manual focus
really wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
great battery power (470 shots)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
better than average battery power (380 shots)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging info
Olympus SH-1 Vlogging info
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone port
really wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with microphone jack
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | 380 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $429 | $349 |