Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-2
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR800 was brought out 19 months before the SH-2 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the SH-2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus SH-2
| EX-ZR800 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| SH-2 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2015 |  | August 2013 | Newer by 19 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus SH-2
| EX-ZR800 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the SH-2.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and SH-2 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The image here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and SH-2.
Plainly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels so you can expect similar quality of pictures however you should really consider the age of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR800 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography features
Olympus SH-2 Portrait photography features
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
no manual focus
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography highlights
Olympus SH-2 Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (222g)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
has touch focus
lighter than others (271 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography advice
Olympus SH-2 Sports photography advice
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (470 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
good battery life (380 shots)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Travel photography with Olympus SH-2
better than average battery pack (470 shots)
lighter than average in class (222g)
megapixel count good (16MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
very long reach (450mm)
does not have selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
good battery life (380 shots)
lighter than others (271 grams)
has touch focus
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography details
Olympus SH-2 Landscape photography details
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
better than average battery pack (470 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
decently wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (380 CIPA)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging info
Olympus SH-2 Vlogging info
quite wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (222 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
no external mic port
decently wide (25mm)
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (271g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2015-03-11 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 11.5fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | 380 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $429 | $399 |