Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2014

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR800 was launched 5 months prior to the TG-850 iHS which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the TG-850 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
EX-ZR800 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR800
TG-850 iHS | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
EX-ZR800 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2013 | ![]() | January 2014 | Same age |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus TG-850 iHS has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the TG-850 iHS.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and TG-850 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The picture underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and TG-850 iHS.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of files though you need to consider the launch date of the cameras into account.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-08-07 | 2014-01-29 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4616 x 3464 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | 330 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $429 | $250 |