Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-610
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
Olympus TG-610
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-610, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the TG-610 (14MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR800 was introduced 2 years later than the TG-610 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the TG-610 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-610. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus TG-610
| EX-ZR800 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2013 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 32 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Sharper display (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| TG-610 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-610
| EX-ZR800 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 comes with physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus TG-610 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-610 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the TG-610.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and TG-610 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The photograph below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and TG-610.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to provide you with more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR800 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-610 Portrait photography information
focusing manually
MP count decent (16MP)
provides face detection focus
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-610 as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (222g)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Sports photography with Olympus TG-610
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (470 shots)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (210 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography details
Olympus TG-610 Travel photography details
better than average battery life (470 CIPA)
lighter than average (222 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long reach (450mm)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
environment sealing
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
not so great battery pack (210 per charge)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-610 Landscape photography highlights
focusing manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
better than average battery life (470 per charge)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
pretty wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
not so great battery pack (210 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-610 as a Vlogging camera
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (222g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no external mic socket
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus TG-610 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus TG-610 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-08-07 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | 210 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $429 | $223 |