Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daa88/daa88bfe6d889d427e008123c5647754bbcdb923" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is pretty similar and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-ZR800 was released 8 months after the TG-830 iHS and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the TG-830 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
EX-ZR800 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 8 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR800
TG-830 iHS | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
EX-ZR800 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the TG-830 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae873/ae873072a333f75fb59c764e9e4fcf5ac194a2b1" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and TG-830 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06194/061941a89da85aa24a970fabe93207b07478e291" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over specifications. The picture here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and TG-830 iHS.
Plainly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution and you can expect similar quality of files though you should really consider the age of the products into consideration. The more modern EX-ZR800 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0c86/a0c860246d11f1ca1f0d001167035198ba008eb5" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e32a1/e32a18250207827bdfccffb47d3decf55f56aa24" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 214g (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | 300 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $429 | $0 |