Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-4

Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed August 2013
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Revealed April 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
  • Replacement is Olympus TG-5
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview

Below, we will be matching up the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus TG-4, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-ZR800 was manufactured 20 months earlier than the TG-4 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR800 matches up against the TG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus TG-4

          

          

            
 EX-ZR800 TG-4 
Screen resolution922k460kCrisper screen (+462k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Casio EX-ZR800

          

          

            
 TG-4 EX-ZR800 
RevealedApril 2015August 2013Newer by 20 months
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-4

          

          

            
 EX-ZR800 TG-4 
Manually focus  More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Selfie screen  Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen  Absent Touch screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides outer measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus TG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the TG-4.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and TG-4 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Oftentimes, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specifications. The image here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and TG-4.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photos however you really should take the launch date  of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR800 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

            Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography info
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography info
43
 focusing manually
 good megapixels (16 megapixels)
 supports face detect autofocus
 cannot use external flash
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
46
 focusing manually
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 comes with face detection focusing
 supports RAW files
 manual mode not available
 cannot use external flash
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Street Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography details
Olympus TG-4 Street photography details
61
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition (222 grams)
 no moving screen
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports RAW files
 weather proof
 screen does not articulate
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 heavier than competitors (247g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography info
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography info
50
 excellent zoom range (25-450mm  18.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good megapixels (16MP)
 supports tracking focus
 good battery life (470 per charge)
 max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect autofocus
47
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 weather proof
 great battery pack (380 shots)
 low fps (5.0 frames per second)
 no shutter priority
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography highlights
74
 good battery life (470 per charge)
 lighter than competition (222 grams)
 good megapixels (16 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 relatively wide (25mm)
 very long reach (450mm)
 does not have selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
74
 great battery pack (380 CIPA)
 weather proof
 megapixel count decent (16MP)
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 great maximum aperture (f2.0)
 heavier than competitors (247 grams)
 does not posses selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography highlights
54
 focusing manually
 relatively wide (25mm)
 good sized screen (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good megapixels (16MP)
 good battery life (470 shots)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
62
 focusing manually
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 great maximum aperture (f2.0)
 nice screen size (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 supports RAW files
 weather proof
 great battery pack (380 per charge)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 manual mode not available
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Vlogging Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Vlogging camera
 Olympus TG-4 as a Vlogging camera
34
 relatively wide (25mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detect autofocus
 video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than competition (222g)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 does not have selfie friendly display
 lack of mic port
34
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 great maximum aperture (f2.0)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with face detection focusing
 good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 does not posses selfie friendly screen
 doesn't have external mic support
 heavier than competitors (247g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
        
                
        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-4
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Olympus Tough TG-4
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Olympus Tough TG-4
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Revealed 2013-08-07 2015-04-13
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
Continuous autofocus    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Number of focus points - 25
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range 4cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 922k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range 4.70 m 7.90 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 222 grams (0.49 lb) 247 grams (0.54 lb)
Dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 photographs 380 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-130 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $429 $379